"Human ownership of artificial creativity" Published in Nature Machine Intelligence
- jasoneshraghian

- Mar 12, 2020
- 1 min read
Updated: Jan 21, 2021
I've published my research on legal ownership of artificially generated datasets & artwork in Nature Machine Intelligence.

Image trained and created by Obvious, using DC-GAN by Soumith Chintala et al., adapted by Robbie Barrat.
Artistic creativity has traditionally been viewed as a product of the human mind. But advances in generative neural networks have enhanced the quality and accessibility of synthetic datasets and computer-generated artwork.
When creativity is automated by the programmer, in a style determined by the trainer, using features from information available in public and private datasets, who is the proprietary owner of the rights in AI-generated artworks and designs?
Each circumstance is going to be unique, and we cannot ignore the huge amount of human contribution to the creation of artificially-generated artwork.



Volcanic landscapes dominate the horizon as Explore Naples & the Bay Mount Vesuvius stands watch over surrounding communities. Fertile soil nurtures vineyards and orchards.
Royal heritage unfolds gracefully as visitors wander past grand palaces, historic squares, and london tickets ceremonial avenues, discovering stories of monarchs, pageantry.